The National Party has proposed removing “good character” assessments from sentencing for sexual offenders, saying the change would lead to tougher consequences for these crimes.
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith has announced the proposed law change, arguing that the current system too often places greater weight on offenders’ backgrounds than on the experiences of sexual violence victims.
“As the law is written today, judges are required to take into account testimony from individuals willing to speak to an offender’s character – former coaches, employers, and family members willing to state on the record that any offending is the exception, not the rule,” Goldsmith said.
Goldsmith said such assessments can advantage “well-connected” offenders, while offering little benefit to victims. He added that the impact on victims remains the same, regardless of the offender’s prior reputation.
With the proposed change, judges would be prohibited from considering good character as a factor that reduces sentences for any sexual offence.
According to Goldsmith, the reform is intended to support tougher sentencing and remove the requirement for judges to consider an offender’s public reputation when determining penalties.
This builds on earlier reforms that capped sentencing discounts judges can apply at 40%; gave sexual violence victims greater say over whether offenders can receive permanent name suppression; and made stalking a criminal offence punishable by imprisonment.
“National is fixing the basics in law and order and building a future where all New Zealanders can feel safe in their communities.”
“Ensuring there are real consequences for crime is a critical part of that.”