November 9, 2026

A broadcaster warned off land sales couldn’t get its own books out on time

Two people in a radio studio broadcasting a show, featuring professional equipment and microphones with a blue theme.

RNZ’s annual report should have been a routine compliance exercise. Instead it has become a test of whether a Crown entity can control its own costs when the minister, Treasury and its main funder are all watching. The accounts arrived more than five weeks after chief financial officer Hilary Parker resigned without warning, and the insider commentary ahead of release points to something worse than a bad year.

One source told the NZ Herald’s Media Insider that RNZ had “accounted for certain things wrongly, in relation to selling property” and had not made previously advised cost reductions. Another put it more bluntly: “They just haven’t done what they’re supposed to have done.”

The warnings were in writing months ago

None of this should surprise anyone in Wellington. In March 2026, Broadcasting Minister Paul Goldsmith’s letter of expectation named financial performance as RNZ’s “top priority” and told it to “right-size operations and increase efficiency to mitigate reliance on cash reserves and land sales.” In May, Treasury echoed the message and flagged RNZ’s in-principle decision to sell its southern Henderson transmission site to NZTA.

The same month, the Budget cut RNZ’s funding by $1.4 million, the second consecutive annual reduction. By August, chief executive Paul Thompson was planning to cut up to 30 jobs, nearly 10% of the workforce, telling staff “we need to do this to remain financially sustainable.”

So the problem was diagnosed, the instructions were explicit, and the timeline was public. If the property-sale accounting is as insiders describe, RNZ appears to have leaned on precisely the crutch it was told to throw away.

The slide started well before the resignation

The last audited accounts show this is not a sudden collapse. In the year to 30 June 2025, RNZ budgeted for a surplus of $4.96 million and instead posted a net deficit of $886,000, a swing of nearly $5.85 million. Total revenue came in $5.72 million under budget while personnel and operating costs both ran over. Government funding was essentially on target at $71.7 million, so the gap was not Wellington’s doing.

That was the year before the one now being reported. Any organisation that misses its plan by almost $6 million should treat the following year as a turnaround. The early signals suggest RNZ did not.

A governance sequence any listed company would be grilled over

Parker resigned on a Friday night, 2 October, and left immediately. The board held an emergency Sunday meeting and installed board member Richard Dellabarca, a chartered accountant, as interim CFO. Chair Brent Impey has said there was “definitely not” any suggestion of criminality, but will not explain the departure.

Then it got sloppier. RNZ had to apologise to NZ On Air, its main funder, for failing to tell it about the resignation until six days after Parker left. NZ On Air requested better communication in future. The report itself slipped past the usual 31 October deadline to land after the election, and the board’s sign-off was conditional on EY completing independent checks for the Auditor-General.

A director stepping into the finance role to finalise accounts the board then approves is not improper in a crisis, but it blurs the line between oversight and management. That is exactly why the external checks matter, and why they took time.

Fifteen minutes to explain a year

Staff were called to a meeting set for just 15 minutes. One source told The Post the short slot “likely reflects how little money we have.” Thompson is also on his way out, with NZME radio boss Jason Winstanley taking over in 2027, which means the person presenting this result will not be the one fixing it.

What happens next

For business readers, this is a familiar pattern from the private sector: revenue underperforms, cost cuts lag, one-off asset sales fill the hole, and finance leadership turns over at the worst moment. The difference is that a private company’s shareholders would already be demanding a forensic review. Taxpayers are the shareholders here.

Whatever the final deficit number, Winstanley inherits a balance sheet that has been propping up operations and a minister who has already run out of patience. Expect more job cuts, a harder line on property and a much shorter leash from Treasury. The real question is whether the board that oversaw this year gets to oversee the next.

Sources

Reader Poll · 5 questions

Do you agree or disagree with the following?

Community

Join the discussion

Add useful context, ask a good question, or challenge an idea — keep it specific and respectful.

Create a commenter account

Enter the name you want shown publicly and your email. We will email you a password-set link; you cannot comment until you use it.

Your email is used for sign-in and account security. It is not published with comments.

Subscribe for weekly news

Subscribe For Weekly News

* indicates required