October 11, 2026

Kiwi importers are already paying for a Saudi oil outage that hasn’t happened

Aerial shot of an oil tanker sailing in the ocean near Vado Ligure, Italy.

A missile hit King Khalid International Airport in Riyadh on 10 October, the third strike there in roughly a week. It struck the complex housing domestic terminals 3 and 4, forcing a full evacuation and suspension of operations. For New Zealand business, the casualty count matters less than this: no oil facility has been touched, and the bill is arriving anyway.

Markets do not wait for physical supply loss. They price probability, and the probability of a Gulf energy disruption just rose again. A country that imports every litre of refined fuel it uses has no buffer against that.

A week of escalation, not a one-off

The latest attack left five people in intensive care and dozens injured. At least 225 flights were cancelled at Riyadh in the preceding 24 hours. A day earlier, the coalition said it intercepted missiles aimed at Riyadh and Khamis Mushait, but debris still damaged a kindergarten and a medical complex. By mid-afternoon on 9 October, almost 50% of Riyadh departures had been cancelled, and Lufthansa Group suspended Riyadh flights through 16 October.

Then came the line that should worry anyone with an energy-exposed cost base. Asked whether the US would join Saudi strikes on the Houthis, President Trump said: “We may. We’re going to look at it”. Direct American entry would widen this conflict well beyond airport terminals, as NBC News reported explosions again rocking the Saudi capital.

Underwriters have redrawn the map

The insurance industry has already moved. Between 5 and 7 October, attacks hit Jizan, Najran, Abha and Riyadh, and analysts at Noah Intelligence argue that changes everything: “The underwriting unit has changed”. Saudi airports can no longer be priced individually. The whole national network is now one risk. Noah puts a 70% probability on another attack on a Saudi civilian airport before the end of the year.

Premiums were climbing before this week. Law firm Kennedys flagged rises of 10% or more even for lower-risk carriers, with Middle East routes facing far steeper hikes. On the water, the Houthis’ July blockade declaration pushed southern Red Sea war-risk premiums from about 0.3% of hull value to over 1% within days, with some Saudi-linked ships quoted at up to 3%. Those costs do not stay in the Gulf. They show up in freight rates, longer routings and claims inflation everywhere.

The 2019 playbook

Hamer Intelligence notes there are no confirmed crude or gas production outages, but markets are pricing higher odds of spillover to export terminals at Jeddah, Yanbu and Ras Tanura. Its warning is blunt: “Even a low single-digit probability of temporary export disruption from a Gulf producer handling c.10% of global crude flows is enough to move flat price and time spreads.” The precedent is the 2019 Abqaiq-Khurais strikes, which drove 5-15% spikes in crude benchmarks despite short-lived physical outages.

New Zealand knows exactly how this transmits. After conflict erupted in late February, Brent rose 41% to USD $102 a barrel by 7 May, and average retail diesel climbed a striking 76%. Stats NZ recorded diesel up 42.6% in the March quarter alone. Every trucking firm, farmer and contractor in the country felt that one.

Stock cover answers the wrong question

Officials will point to the tanks. As at 27 September, MBIE reported total cover, including fuel on the water, of 53.7 days of petrol and 48.2 days of diesel, with jet fuel at 46.5 days. In-country stocks alone sit nearer 28 days. That is reassuring on physical shortage, and it is fair to say supply looks orderly.

But nobody is going to run dry next week. The exposure is price, and stock days do nothing to stop a repricing that lands on the next shipment. Since Marsden Point became an import terminal, NZ pump prices have been a direct pass-through of crude, Asian refining margins, shipping and insurance.

University of Auckland senior lecturer Dulani Jayasuriya describes a compound threat: Red Sea avoidance means ships take longer, so “effective global shipping capacity falls even when the number of ships remains the same”. European buyers then compete with Asia for the same refined cargoes NZ relies on.

What to do before the invoice arrives

The smart move for fuel-heavy businesses is to treat this as a cost event now, not a supply event later. Review fuel surcharge clauses in customer contracts, check how freight forwarders are passing through war-risk and bunker charges, and stress-test margins against a repeat of the autumn diesel spike.

If the next missile hits an oil terminal rather than a passenger terminal, the 2019 range will look modest. If Washington joins the fight, the premium widens regardless. Either way, Kiwi importers are already paying for a war risk that hasn’t yet cost the world a single barrel.

Sources

Reader Poll · 5 questions

Do you agree or disagree with the following?

Community

Join the discussion

Add useful context, ask a good question, or challenge an idea — keep it specific and respectful.

Create a commenter account

Enter the name you want shown publicly and your email. We will email you a password-set link; you cannot comment until you use it.

Your email is used for sign-in and account security. It is not published with comments.

Subscribe for weekly news

Subscribe For Weekly News

* indicates required