May 20, 2026

International education revenue nearly recovered, diversity nowhere close

Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

The recovery everyone wanted to talk about

The numbers look good on the surface. Education New Zealand reports 92,580 international students enrolled with New Zealand providers in 2025, an 11% increase on 2024 and 80% of the pre-COVID peak. Universities grew 14% to 38,025 students. Export revenue hit $4.3 billion in the 2024/2025 financial year, up 22.8% and sitting at 98% of the 2019 high-water mark.

ENZ Acting Chief Executive Dr Linda Sissons says the results “reflect steady progress driven by the hard work of education providers and ENZ’s brand and promotional activity.”

Steady progress, sure. But progress toward what? The sector has rebuilt volume without fixing the vulnerability that made the COVID collapse so painful.

Same customers, same risk

China accounts for 34% of enrolments and India for 14%, meaning nearly half of the entire international student body comes from two countries. Japan sits at 9%, South Korea and Sri Lanka at 4% each, and everyone else is in the low single digits.

The government set a target to reduce China’s share below 35%, which it technically met at 33.5%. India’s share, however, exceeded its 11% target. Diversification is happening at the margins, if it is happening at all.

The financial exposure is sharper than the enrolment numbers suggest. A March 2026 report from the New Zealand China Council found Chinese students contributed approximately one-third of New Zealand’s export education revenue in 2024, with each Chinese student spending an estimated $58,576 annually, well above the international average of $45,776. Council Chair John McKinnon warns that “an education relationship which is too one-sided will not serve us well in future.”

China’s demographic cliff is already visible

The concentration risk is not just geopolitical. China’s birth rate has been declining since 2022, which means the outbound student pool will contract over the next decade regardless of how aggressively New Zealand markets itself. Meanwhile, the competitive field has expanded from the traditional ‘Big Four’ destinations into what the China Council describes as a ‘Big Fourteen’, with European and Asian universities now actively courting Chinese students.

New Zealand is fighting harder for a shrinking pie. That is not a growth strategy.

The $7.2 billion target rests on shaky foundations

The government’s Going for Growth plan targets 119,000 enrolments and $7.2 billion in revenue by 2034. An RNZ analysis published today identifies three constraints that sit awkwardly against that ambition.

Housing is already under pressure. Dunedin’s median weekly rent rose 12% in mid-2025 despite more listings hitting the market. Auckland, home to 55% of all international students, faces the same squeeze at larger scale.

Funding is moving in the wrong direction. Budget 2025 cut approximately $45 million from research funding, undermining the academic reputation that attracts postgraduate students. The system is being asked to grow international revenue while shrinking the investment that makes it competitive.

And the labour market implications are real. Master’s enrolments are now at 185% of pre-pandemic levels, driven predominantly by Asian markets. Infometrics has raised concerns that expanded post-study work rights could crowd domestic graduates out of entry-level roles.

India fills the gap but creates a new one

The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement concluded in December 2025 includes a provision preventing caps on Indian student visas. That locks in access to a young, growing population and signals a deliberate policy choice to lean into India as a growth market.

The logic is sound. India’s demographics are the mirror image of China’s contraction. But swapping one dominant source market for another is not diversification. It is replacing a known concentration risk with an emerging one.

What business owners should actually watch

For anyone with exposure to student accommodation, university-town property, hospitality near campuses, or graduate recruitment pipelines, the metric that matters is not the 11% headline growth. It is the 48% of enrolments sitting in two source markets, one of which faces structural demographic decline and the other locked in by trade agreement.

Sixty-five percent of Chinese students are concentrated in Auckland. A geopolitical disruption, a visa policy change in Beijing, or simply the gravitational pull of closer, cheaper competitors could thin those numbers faster than the sector can replace them. The pandemic proved that. The recovery has not proved it cannot happen again.

Sources

Subscribe for weekly news

Subscribe For Weekly News

* indicates required